There are days when no matter where you go people feel that always happens to dissect the same topic. It would be natural if it were a news of the day or a trend that is particularly affirming that mome
n to. During this time, from anywhere around me, including the room where the other day I spent two hours for me to bend to the hair, I do not hear that talk about betrayal and how, now, the monogamous are becoming an endangered species. The subject is so vast that no one could lay claim to the claim to be exhaustive or to reach a definitive conclusion. There are those who betrayed because he does not want to resist, because it wants to maintain its freedom of choice or simply because the passion between the couple was turned off and, therefore, look elsewhere. There are those who betray for fun, out of habit, for bulimia of adventures, lifestyle, desire for change, for momentary infatuation, without involvement by gender, for physical attraction. There not to betray those who betray themselves. But then, one wonders, in a world of infinite possibilities, where you change partners thicker than a telephone company, monogamy is really more important? Before the summer, my friend Angelique, during a dinner at the home of friends in Milan he met Gabriel, 37, a lawyer, a man in his career, outgoing but at the same time, very refined. At the end of the night, exchanging phones and the intention to meet again a few days later for a drink disengaged. Given the growing understanding, was followed by other three, respectively, in the three successive nights, accompanied by romantic walks in around town, thanks a climate that left a foretaste of the impending summer and a few close encounter of some kind. Everything seemed to go well despite the imminent departure of Angelique for Paris, when Gabriel gives the phrase that has forever undermined any possible future expectations: "I'd fall in love but I'm afraid to change my lifestyle." For someone like Angelique this sentence would have been sufficient because the word "fear" should not exist in the vocabulary of a man when it comes to feelings. But it was not all: "The commitments are not for me. Moreover, the fidelity is only a mental construction. Relationships are often built on the false certainty one of them can not betray each other. But if you really love for two monogamy should be the most natural thing, if what is natural becomes a statistical concept, then the high percentage of traitors betrayed or make natural betrayal. " Angelique syllogism
found this so amusing that I could not stop laughing and decided that tonight would be the last time he went to bed with Gabriel. He would never put a man like that but did not want to betray herself and her desire to have fun that night. Gabriel could never be a potential love life but it could be a nice momentary fun even though she continued, impassive, to make him believe something different. Moreover, despite everything, it was still quite attractive. That night they left promising to feel the next day. But Angelique has not done more to find. What could be more exhilarating than to read the heartfelt messages of a polygamist unrepentant?
few days later, as I listened to his story, I kept thinking it was the justification for the betrayal was more incredible that I ever heard. Some people said to do with the betrayal of friends to boast, who confesses to partner to download a conscience, who hides, who thinks it's only a "holy lie, those who commit sin or omission of a couple who adopt an open or secretly open. But, difficult, I could think of a defense motion so original. Certainly, on the other hand, if you generally do not betray him because it seems wrong, or perhaps because, at the behest of the case, there is next to the person with whom there could be better understood on all sides, I think there's anything better than doing a thousand things with the same man instead of one with several thousand men.
0 comments:
Post a Comment